Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint

As Harry Potter begins his 6th year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, he discovers an old book marked mysteriously "This book is the property of the Half-Blood Prince" and begins to learn...( read more  read more... ) more about Lord Voldemort's dark past.

Flixster Users

75% liked it

1,379,460 ratings

Critics

83% liked it

243 critics

PG, 2 hrs. 33 min.

Directed by: David Yates

Release Date: July 15, 2009

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: December 8, 2009

Get It:

Stats: 93,868 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (93,868)


  • October 19, 2009
    Its important once in awhile to remind people that there is significant difference between maturity and just being really super moody. That is something that Yates should have asked before making "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince".
    Now while I'll be honest in admitting I've...( read more) never been too big a fan of the boy who lived, after Alfonso Cuarón"s "Prisoner of Azkaban" (Easily the best potter flick) it showed that the series could be more than its kiddie excess... sadly this latest entry shifts towards the polar opposite. A mirky looking film that uses explosions and bad puberty jokes as though it was a British Michael Bay film.
    I think the problem is that even though its suppose to be a more "mature" film the basic story structure is EXACTLY the same as its been for the last eight years. Yes I know fans already nitpick the differences between the novel but really there's no sense of suspense. Potter finds a old book with a deep dark secret, he follows it down a secret path, craziness with Lord Voldemort ensures and even with a surprise twist at the end (I know those who care already know it but no reason to spoil it for everyone else.) All that went through my mind is that after 5 years of this sh*t shouldn't Harry know better?
    Now its not all bad, the effects get better with each film and the young cast also are getting much better with age, to the point where they may even have careers after this. Plus the older cast is still solid (With a bonus half star going to Alan Rickman going on badass.)
    However its just simply not enough because once again its not that the film is terrible just after 8 freaking years non-potter heads need something new and exciting to actually you know... care.
  • October 5, 2009
    "Why is it that whenever something bad happens, you three are involved?"
    "I've been asking myself the same thing for 6 years".
    So have I, Ron. So have I. After 6 movies of essentially the exact same story, with maybe a little more darkness and death in each installment, I've ...( read more)come to the conclusion that if you don't buy into the mythology of Harry Potter - which comes from reading the books, mostly - then you won't enjoy the movies. At all. This flick is just as critically acclaimed and popular with fans as every other one, and with the exception of the fourth movie, I haven't found a single Harry Potter film to be worth even a moderate thumbs up. The Half-Blood Prince sadly doesn't change that opinion, no matter how disappointing this news is to my girlfriend.

    In terms of it's filmmaking, there's not a whole lot to complain about with this new Potter installment. Oh, sure, the special effects still look kinda cheesy, but so does the CGI in EVERY movie lately. And yes, I became annoyed with the colour palette, which was basically all comprised of depressing grey's and muddy browns. But otherwise, it's a well made movie - the direction by Peter Yates is solid and even inventive at times, the actors are growing with each movie and are almost semi-decent now, and the music by Nicholas Hooper wasn't nearly as bad as everyone said it was. So as a movie, this ain't bad. As pure storytelling, it's just gawdawful. It doesn't reach Twilight levels of inanity, but it's close. Early on in the film, when Harry Potter grabs the last available textbook and it was all old and tattered, I immediately said "That book is gonna be full of clues and scary shit that fuels the plot". This wasn't me being clever, or too smart, or even slighty smart. This was me knowing what was gonna happen because I've seen it 5 fucking times already. Every Harry Potter movie is so similar to the last that it's a miracle ANYone likes these things, let alone nearly everybody. If someone can point to a scene in this flick (other than the climactic death), that is significantly different to something we've already seen, then please, help me out.

    But even without the mind-numbing redundancy and unoriginality of the story, the plot itself is still surprisingly...sloppy. Like, really sloppy. Like the book has probably been chopped up into little pieces level of sloppy. I stopped reading the books after the fourth one (mostly because I stopped enjoying Harry Potter when I turned 14), so I cannot compare this flick to the book. But that should be a good thing, because it offers an outsider's opinion - if a scene or plot development doesn't make sense to someone who hasn't read the book, then it either shouldn't be there or it should be rewritten enough times that it will make coherent sense. But so much of this film is horribly disjointed, and I often got the feeling that large chunks of the narrative were missing. A couple movies ago, Potter and his friends would be facing expulsion for stealing a muggle car - now Harry can apparently blast Draco Malfoy in the chest, making him bleed from several different areas and almost die, and not only face no consequences, but to not even have it mentioned again, ever. Or how Dumbledore needs Potter to go on this big secret fact finding mission, and when the fact is found, Dumbledore not only apparently knew already, but also knows where to teleport to find the artifact (that teleportation was annoying too - why bother with spells and potions and suffering and terror when you can just whisk yourself away at any scary moment? Hell, for that matter - couldn't he have zapped himself away before Snape unleashes his badass all over him?). These are probably things mentioned in the book, possible in great detail. But to get such a short thrift in the adaptation proves that Potter virgins were not given much thought, and that annoys me.

    The best stuff of the movie is in the first 5 minutes. The scary death eater thingies actually did something cool, and Potter was hit on by a hot black chick. All was going well. Then they went back to Hogwarts, and everything you expected to happen happens again - except this time, it takes an extraordinary amount of time to do it in. Seriously, this is a very boring, inert movie. An hour and a half passed in between the exciting beginning and the next action scene; any other movie, and half the crowd would walk out. But somehow, no one cares. Kids and even non-kids eat this shit up. They love it. And I guess I can't complain much....I mean, there's a lot worse entertainments out there, and anything that can keep a kid occupied without explosions every 10 seconds these days should be treasured. But why does it have to be so stilted? Why is there more time and attention given to boring romantic complication subplots then the Hitler of wizards coming back to wreak havoc? Sure, all that stuff is interesting when you care about the characters, but it's hard to care about people who have been on our theatre screens for a total of 15 hours now and never fucking change or grow, other than physically. And most oddly of all; the movie isn't even very magical. It's too dark and drab to be. The small, light moments of magic were kinda delightful, like the library books that float to their shelf spaces, or the busted up room that fixes itself. That was cool. Seeing wizards run around a dark cornfield and zap light from their wands wasn't.

    But like I said, there's worse entertainments out there. If you're thinking of anything involving Marlon Wayans or Optimus Prime, then there's a LOT worse entertainments out there then Harry Potter. But there's so much better stuff in theatres, too. Want thrills? Go see Star Trek again. Want magic? Can't do better than Ponyo. And hell, if you want to see dark mythology filmed with any sense of maturity, intelligence, and ORIGINALITY, go rent Watchmen and see what you missed. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince aims for it's demographic, and never even tries to achieve anything better. JK Rowling is probably the laziest rich writer out there, and these movies aren't making her any more popular with me. And I think that's far sadder than any old wizard getting killed.
  • September 22, 2009
    Pretty entertaining. And darker than ever. Good thing I haven't become too attached to these people.
  • September 18, 2009
    I found this exciting and had a wow factor to alot. It was better than previous Potter films, obviously there is a lot uncovered but I think overall it was good. I am not too sure if I would want to watch this again and again but its certainly something I could stick on in the ba...( read more)ckground and half concentrate on. I like the literature fantasy element the most and the surreal realist English Scenes. Acting was pretty poor though. Best actors were Rupert Grint and Jim Broadbent.
  • September 1, 2009
    Here is where the books start to take a really dark turn. I was so excited to see how this was brought to us on film and I must say I was...a bit disappointed.
    It was a good movie, but I just did not live up to my expectations given the last several installments.
    It felt as th...( read more)ough they were trying to throw together bits and pieces here and there and the movie felt completely split. We had the hunt for Voldemort and then a side dish of everything else going on.
    The Half-Blood Prince portion that was so dark and predominant in the book was left more to the imagination than I would have liked. Harry's obsession was never given to us on film as it was in the book. The trip to the cave was so much more in the book than the film and so very important.
    I felt a bit cheated. I know they gave 2.5 hours to us, but if it took another 20 to tell the tale well then I would have seen that because this convoluted mess left me wanting...and wondering.
    From a cinematic standpoint this was all beautifully done. Truly marvelous.
    From a "telling of the tale" standpoint, I really had hoped for more.
    I will purchase the DVD upon its release to add to the rest and hope that there is a "director's cut" that puts back in what was somehow lost in translation.
  • November 22, 2009
    Cuma orang bego yang ngelewatin filem ini.
  • November 22, 2009
    This is without a doubt the worst Harry Potter movie! If you haven't red the book, the movie makes absoluty no sense. They picked all the best moments of the book, make scenes out of it and that's the movie. There is NO story.....And some of the most crucial parts of the books ar...( read more)e left out! It's unbelievable!!! In the entire film, the word: Half-Blood Prince is used twice! BUT ISN'T THIS THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF THE BOOK!?!?! They explain nothing. Why is dumbledore searching for Horcruxes? You don't know, unless you've red the book.

    Really I have no words for this. It sucked, big time. What a waste of time.
  • November 22, 2009
    Plot 4
    Production 4
    Entertainment 4
    Characters 4
    Originality 1
  • November 21, 2009
    This Harry Potter Movie is different. The ending of it is really tragic.
  • November 21, 2009
    Watched the other five? Loved all of them? watch this one!!!

Critic Reviews


July 20, 2009
Anthony Lane, The New Yorker

All in all, despite the verve that drives the grander set pieces, it's hard to avoid the sensation of a film toiling overtime to convince itself of its own solemnity. full review

July 17, 2009
Nigel Andrews, The Financial Times

Dear me, what a dull fight this has become. At points in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince I feared slipping into a persistent vegetative state. full review

July 15, 2009
Armond White, The New York Press

Astoundingly unimaginative, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ruins the idea of popular entertainment. full review

July 15, 2009
Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com

The Half-Blood Prince is a beautifully paced feat of filmmaking, one that navigates potentially choppy shifts in scale with grace and ease. full review

July 14, 2009
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

Harry is better than ever, a triumph of visual wonder and emotional storytelling. full review

July 14, 2009
Colin Covert, The Minneapolis Star Tribune

Unlike most film series, the Potter movies haven't weakened along the way. full review

July 14, 2009
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times

As its 2-½ hours came to a close, I was happy to be reminded that we aren't yet done with Hogwarts, and that there's much pleasure in a story slowly told. full review

July 13, 2009
Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail

The experienced team behind the Harry Potter movie series is comfortably in the groove with the sixth film, which plays down the fantastic elements and introduces contrasting playful teenaged romance ... full review

July 13, 2009
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer

Half-Blood Prince is a bubbling cauldron of hormonal angst, rife with romance and heartbreak, jealousy and longing. full review

July 13, 2009
Amy Biancolli, Houston Chronicle

So many actors shine in so many ways: Carter hisses deliciously, Broadbent sucks up beautifully. Watson shudders with frustration and heartbreak, Felton shudders with anger and fear. full review

View more Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • myid38
    September 30, 2009
    Download and watch the new movie Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince http://blog-movie.com/Harry-Potter-and-the-Half-Blood-Prince.html
  • abde71992
    September 4, 2009
    Harry Potter of the best movies ever made and I follow it since I was young, one of the great films and Part VI I liked a lot
  • bcjammerx
    August 30, 2009
    Wow...it's like the sole purpose of this movie is to tell you
    "hey they hit puberty"
    "hey, there's gonna be another movie"
    "voldimort isn't dead yet"

    That's...it...I remember the previews mentioning a "new magic" ? Or something... To call this movie flat and boring give it too much, there is NOTHING in this movie!

    "The half blood prince" title makes you wonder, who is he? Where did he come from? What part does he play? What powers will he have? What is he a half blood of?

    Guess what...nothing is told...in a dull fight scene where harry is overpowered by an older more experienced wizards (what else would happen) the guys just blurts out "I am the half blood prince"...and that's it.

    There is NOTHING to this movie, it was beyond lame!
  • trc751
    August 29, 2009
    i saw the film in england,and maybe because i was home there i loved it,of course being in England and seeing an english film captivates the mind,i am ever mindful of the magic and mysticism of old england that i explore with my son like york ,and Wales we spent the week in Wales literally looking at witches and fairies in the shops,very Celtic,and one can then see all the stories and magic of the books and the movie,i got the impression that the movie is leading us on through the teenage and then grown up. part of childhood ending, and really seeing love and other people in depth like one does as you grow up ,all smooshed in with magic and hurt of loosing a loved one....and we all experience painful things as we grow older and realize that death is the end of a person the final chapter of the elders,but the begining of ones adulthood,it makes it'S point not done yet,for who will be Harrys first love?(Ginny)?and Ron can't quite see Hermoine yet swooning over him,ah ''teen love!! yeah?
  • vivhenderson
    August 29, 2009
    I really enjoyed this film. It's a while since I read the book so the ramping up of the romantic storylines came as a bit of a surprise. The unfortunate event still got me thinking. Looking forward to the next instalments - meanwhile I think I'll read the books again!!!
  • hermione01
    August 22, 2009
    I read the book and really liked the movie. Films sometimes can be diferent from books and still be good! Sure, I had to watch it twice to know what happned there exactly but then I liked it. I also tryed to take some things I didn't like and focus on the best of this movie.
  • superstandardman
    August 18, 2009
    it wasn't very good. it would have been okay if u didnt read the book but having read it there was no epic fight scene at the end! plus they messed up the whole lucky potion deal and harry is supposed to be paralyzed underneath the cloak watching helplessly not pacing back and forth under the stairs argh! not like the technology is out of our reach here pplz.
  • rachelleqld
    August 15, 2009
    I am desperately after a copy of this movie. Even a burnt copy will do. Willing to swap other movies. If you have this movie, please message me.
  • iamnotamoose
    July 29, 2009
    This movie was so much better than I expected, since, quite frankly, I was pretty unimpressed by The Order of the Phoenix.
    Not only were the effects fantastic - I'm thinking mainly of the huge fire spell near the end, for any who've seen the film - and the acting a triumph from all concerned, but the storytelling was highly accessible to all members of the audience. Although the film managed to capture well the enroaching darkness pervading this penultimate tale in the series, I have to congratulate David Yates for still giving the film a lighter element, adding a sense of enjoyment to the dramatics whilst in no way detracting from the sinister suspense.
    On a negative note, the film did rush towards the end and some important points from the book were cut. For instance, Fenrir Greyback's character was never really explained, and so relied heavily on the audience already having read the book.
    Since I have to keep this comment short - go see this awesome piece of film-making!

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Inkheart
    Inkheart (67%)
  • Twilight
    Twilight (77%)
  • J.K. Rowling and the Birth of Harry Potter
    J.K. Rowling and the Birth of Harry Potter (89%)
  • Hogfather
    Hogfather (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Harry Potter and ... : Watch Free on TV


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Trivia

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood P... Trivia


  • The 6th " Harry Potter " Movie Name is ...  Answer »
  • In Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, whose old school book does the teacher give him to use? a. Pro. Lupi b. Pro. Snape c. Locious Malfroy d. James Potter e. Pro. Dumbledore As Half-Blood Prince has not even been filmed yet, I thought this was a quiz about MOVIES not books. Correct?  Answer »
  • what is harry potter after in harry potter and the half-blood prince with dumble dore?  Answer »
  • In which Harry Potter book does Ron say: "Hey - hey you lot! Midgets!"   Answer »

Most Popular Skin