10,000 B.C.

10,000 B.C.

44% Liked It
liked it

10,000 B.C.

Camilla Belle, Steven Strait, Tim Barlow, Suri van Sornsen, Omar Sharif, Marco Khan, Joel Virgel, Cliff Curtis, Reece Ritchie

A prehistoric epic that follows a young mammoth hunter's journey through uncharted territory to secure the future of his tribe.

Id: 10888589

Do you want to see this movie?

My Friends Said...


Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Recent Reviews


  • September 29, 2009
    Alright, so 10,000 BC is not historically accurate, for instance woolly mammoths and horses did not roam earth at the same time, but as a bit of an escape, 10,000 BC is fine. The hero has to convince many tribes to join together to defeat the evil master.
  • July 11, 2009
    Roland Emmerich's latest blockbuster offering 10,000 BC tells the age old tale of a young tribesman D'Leh who crosses mountains to rescue his ladylove Evolet from the enemies.

    I thought it was terrible. Sure, some of the prehistoric animals looked fine, but that was about it...( read more). Talk about bloopers - the actors don't look prehistoric, the make-up was bad (who had perfect white teeth in 10,000 BC?) What's with the almost-dreadlocks? And the mammoths - weren't they supposed to belong to the Ice Age, and Ice Age only? What are they doing dragging huge blocks in the middle of a desert? Even the plot is so outdated and lame.

    The only reason I'm giving this a two is because the Sabertooth looked really awesome. Even though it just came out from nowhere, at least they made something out of this huge epic pile of garbage.

    Total waste of money. Compared to Apocalypto - one of the best epics I've seen so far - this movie is nothing.
  • May 21, 2009
    Once upon a time, I wrote a detailed review about this crappy film. Mysteriously, it has disappeared off Flixster. I kind of wish this movie would have disappeared during production. But anyways, here's my review in a nutshell since I can't remember details:

    *ahem*

    This fi

    ...( read more)lm sucks really really bad. It's awful. I say so, 91% of critics say so, and a majority of moviegoers also say so. So if you decide to watch this crapfest after knowing all this, then somebody should pee on you. Thank you, and have a nice day.
  • April 9, 2009
    Two stars are for the sfx only.story is way to dull and its just so boring.Took me 4 go's to watch this on dvd and i wish i never did!Words to mr emmerich is to go back and make those sci-fi,disaters flicks he's good at.......
  • April 7, 2009
    Like Emmerichs previous films, I knew not to expect anything serious, this was gonna be pure popcorn, and its not that bad popcorn either. Emmerich always produces good fun films and this is another good example. The plot is sooooooo very done before haha and the cast are rather ...( read more)hammy and cliched but it all works nicely with the silly story and over the top action. Mostly newcomers by the look of things, afew big names, but generally its a new line up which does work in the films favour, any big shot names in lead roles and it becomes too serious or trying to be serious.

    The effects are nice, not great but it does look good. You can tell its cgi but the vista's and mammoths do look good on the desert landscape. The tribes and costumes are the best, all look very realistic and quite accurate, certainly gives Mel Gibsons Apocalypto a good run for the money.

    There some obvious problems here and there though, what actual time period are we in? Jurassic? Prehistoric? Egyptian?

    The way he kills the almighty at the end is very very daft, and a bloody good shot haha
    The whole sabretooth tiger mini plot is really stupid, the girl coming back to life at the end, and what exactly is so special about her etc...

    There are many bad plot holes and really, its a really daft mix or rip of many other films which is poor really. Its not that much different from his earlier film Stargate. But...at the end of the day its silly and very cheesey but its fun, I just wish they were alittle more accurate with that timeline hehe kinda spoils it cos its so wrong.
  • November 24, 2009
    Why was this movie made?
  • November 21, 2009
    I wanted to see this film on my birthday when it first came out! But my friend wanted to watch a stupid cartoon instead, We went to see the stupid cartoon! !
  • November 17, 2009
    This film is a mish-mosh of historical, geographic, and biological nonsense, but it's fun to watch anyway. The photography and SFX are beautiful. The characters are likable (or just the opposite where the villains are concerned)and well acted. Forget realism, this is Conan with a...( read more) message, better acting, and better cinematography.
  • November 17, 2009
    "10,000 B.C." was yet another movie directed by Emmerich that failed to impress.

    Like Emmerich's previous movie, "The Day After Tomorrow", "10,000 B.C." had an awesome trailer and breath-taking special effects. Unfortunately, it seems like too much time was spent creating dazzl...( read more)ing effects while forgetting to include the key elements -- tension and suspense.

    I found myself yawning and even almost falling asleep at one point while surviving through the mammoth-paced storyline. It was mainly the weak dialog and the mundane acting that tore down what could have been a successful movie.

    You should see it if:

    - You love stunning special effects and sound effects

    - A shirtless man is all you care about

    - You are into cheesy love stories (Girl is kidnapped, boy goes across the world to rescue!)

    Run far, far away if:

    - You are expecting hardcore action from "300" or "Apocalypto"

    - Superior acting is what you seek

    - You are not patient enough for boring dialogs
  • November 16, 2009
    good, but over hyped

Opening This Week

Top Box Office

Upcoming Movies

New on DVD